The National Student Research Center
E-Journal of Student Research: Science
Volume 3, Number 6, May, 1995


The National Student Research Center is dedicated to promoting student research and the use of the scientific method in all subject areas across the curriculum especially science and math.

For more information contact:

John I. Swang, Ph.D.
Founder/Director
National Student Research Center
2024 Livingston Street
Mandeville, Louisiana 70448
U.S.A.
E-Mail: nsrcmms@communique.net
http://youth.net/nsrc/nsrc.html

THE E-DATABASE OF STUDENT RESEARCH is made possible through grants provided by the United States Department of Education, South Central Bell Telephone, American Petroleum Institute, Intertel Foundation, Springhouse Publishing Corporation, Graham Resources, Inc., Chevron Oil Company, Central Louisiana Electric Company, Louisiana State Department of Education, and National Science Foundation. Mandeville Middle School and the National Student Research Center thank these organizations for their generous support of education.



TABLE OF CONTENT

1.  Does Acid Rain Affect the Rate of Photosynthesis of Aquatic
    Plants?
2.  Backdrafting In Homes
3.  Water Pollution's Effect on Daphnia
4.  Erosion on the Minnehaha Creek
5.  Killing Mildew
6.  Does Placing of Magnets Effect the Swing of a Pendulum?
7.  Penny On The Ground
8.  Passive Solar Energy
9.  Does Vision Affect Taste
10. A comparison of Recent and Recorded Temperatures
11. The Effect of Earthworms In the Soil


Title:  Does Acid Rain Affect the Rate of Photosynthesis of
        Aquatic Plants?

Student Researcher:  Andrew Hachiya
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Mrs. Cope


Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

The objective of my research project was to study the effect of 
acid rain on aquatic plants.  Specifically, experiments were 
designed to determine how variations in the pH of an aquatic 
environment might affect the rate of photosynthesis of Eloden 
densa.  For any given plant, there is an optimal pH for the 
maximal rate of photosynthesis.  My hypothesis was that varying 
the pH towards a more acidic environment, as would occur with 
acid rain, will adversely affects the rate of photosynthesis.  
In my experiments, the rate of photosynthesis was quantified by 
the amount of the end product oxygen produced and overall plant 
growth during the observational period.

Methodology:

I filled each beaker with 1000 mL of spring water and titrated 
each beaker to a certain pH.  I put 17 grams of Elodea densa 
under an inverted glass funnel which was attached to a 
manometer setup.  As the plants photosynthesized, the oxygen 
released would go threw the manometer.  That was my first test.  
My second test was that I weighed the plants before and after 
the experiment to determine the growth.

Analysis of the Data:

As the pH of the aquatic environments were experimentally 
decreased, the amount of oxygen produced by Elodea densa, and 
overall plant growth, was decreased.  Qualitatively, it was 
observed that decreasing the pH resulted in the loss of 
chlorophyll and destruction of cell structure.

Summary and Conclusions:

My conclusion is that acid rain can adversely affect the rate 
of photosynthesis in aquatic plants.  This research project 
would suggest that the decreased rate of photosynthesis by 
Elodea densa in an acidic environment is caused by an 
alteration of enzyme activity, less chlorophyll and loss of 
plant cellular integrity.

Application

Acid rain does have the power to kill the plant life in a pond 
or a small lake.  Without the plants, we will not be able to 
receive the oxygen that we need and the animals need also.  So 
lets stop burning as much fossil fuel as we are right now!



Title:  Backdrafting In Homes

Student Researcher:  Erin E. Duffy
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Cecelia Cope
  

1. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

I wanted to know if most homes have sufficient replacement air 
or do they experience backdrafting when the furnace and/or hot 
water heater are running.  I predicted that 15% of the homes I 
test will have backdrafting.  I feel that most homeowners have 
sealed their homes so tightly in an effort to conserve energy 
that replacement air is insufficient.  If I find instances of 
backdrafting, I will inform the homeowner of the situation 
which may represent a health risk to the homeowner.  With this 
information, the homeowner may choose to change their home 
environment.

II. Methodology:

The materiels I gathered for the test were matches, a candle, 
flashlight, and the checklists.  After obtaining permission to 
test the home from the homeowner, I shut all windows, doors, 
and fireplace dampers.  Then I ran hot water until the water 
heater came on and turned up the thermostat so the furnace came 
on.  After lighting the candle and blowing it out, I placed the 
smoking candle near the hood of the draft diverter and observed 
which direction the smoke drifted.  After recording my results, 
I turned on all additional exterior air exhausting equipment 
and ran the test again.

III. Analysis of Data: 

I found no homes that backdrafted which supported my 
hypothesis.

IV. Summary and Conclusion::

I found no backdrafting in the homes I tested, but I did 
observe many air leaks in these homes such as ill-fitting ducts 
going through the rim joist and poorly sealed doors and 
windows.  I was unable to test any high energy efficient homes 
and therefore I am unaware if they are at a greater risk for 
backdrafting or not.

V.  Application:

Not only did I learn the importance of replacement air, but in 
the homes I tested, the homeowner learned of its importance and 
became aware of the potential dangers.



Title:  Water Pollution's Effect on Daphnia

Student Researcher:  Billy Judd
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Mrs. Cope


Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

My topic is about water pollution and daphnia.  I wanted to 
find out what would happen if I put some daphnia in four 
different kinds of polluted water. My first hypothesis stated 
that the daphnia in the bowl of water polluted with the soap 
would have the most dead daphnia in it.  My second hypothesis 
stated that my control would have the most survivors.

Methodology:

I tested my hypothesis in an experiment in which I put daphnia 
in bowls of water that had a certain pollutants in it.  Bowl 1 
was polluted with soap.  Bowl 2 was polluted with a high level 
of dechlorination liquid.  Bowl 3 had a mix of soap and 
dechlorination liquid.  Bowl 4 had the perfect amount of 
dechlorination liquid in the water.  The materials I used were: 
microscope, light source, water, bowls, soap, dechlorination 
liquid, slides, thermometer, measuring cup, yeast, and daphnia.  
First, I filled the bowls with water and then put the daphnia 
in.  After this I feed them some yeast and then added the 
polluting substance.  I let it sit for a while and then I 
examined a sample of water on a slide from each bowl under a 
microscope and recorded what I saw.

Analysis of Data:

I looked at the data I had collected and most of the daphnia in 
Bowl 1 did die.  Very few in the control bowl had died.  This 
data supported both of my hypotheses.

Summary and Conclusion:

I found out that daphnia will die if the water they line in is 
polluted with a soapy substance.  My data says that soap and 
other products such as dechlorinating liquid can kill organism 
in water if used improperly.  I accept both of my hypotheses.

Application:

My experiment shows what could happen if just a small amount of 
pollution gets into the water. So no pollution should be taken 
lightly because you never know what could happen.  



Title: Erosion on the Minnehaha Creek

Student: Jo Fricton
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade: 7
Teacher: Mrs. Cope


I.  Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis: 

The Minnehaha weaves through the city as a quiet creek that 
adds to the charm, beauty, and wildlife of the city.  The creek 
is a recreational park that allows fishing, tubing, canoeing, 
and walks along the bank.  The banks are eroding in many places 
causing problems such as damage to yards, houses, and city 
parks.  Narrower and lost walkways along the parks prevent 
bikes, running, and walking along the creek.  In addition, a 
significant amount of funds is required to correct the damage 
every year caused by erosion.  A recent television program 
talked about erosion in the creek as a major problem for 
Minneapolis Park Board.

For these reasons, I chose my project to find more ways to 
prevent erosion along the creek and eliminate these problems.  
The questions I would like to answer include whether erosion 
control factors such as bank vegetation, trees, rocks, and 
storm drains reduce the amount of erosion along the Minnehaha 
Creek.  This study may provide answers on how we can prevent 
erosion along it's banks.  I want to know if erosion, as 
measured by the Erosion Index, is more where there is less 
erosion control present along the Minnehaha Creek.  
Specifically, the hypotheses to test include: 1) Erosion, as 
measured by the Erosion Index, is more at narrow and deep bends 
along the creek.  2) Erosion, as measured by the Erosion Index, 
occurs at places with less vegetation.  These are places where 
there are no roots to hold the soil from being washed away by 
the water runoff.  3) Erosion, as measured by the Erosion 
Index, occurs where storm drains are not located along the 
creek.  These places have higher erosion due to runoff from the 
rain making gullies and crevices.  4) Erosion, as measured by 
the Erosion Index, occurs at places with less trees on the 
banks.

This study will tell us whether these factors are important in 
controlling erosion along the creek.  If so, these factors can 
be changed or implemented to provide a cost effective way of 
preventing erosion.

II.  Methodology:

This study design will be an observational study to quantify 
the amount of erosion and erosion control factors that occur 
along the Minnehaha Creek.  I hopes to determine what factors 
play a role in erosion.  Two independent observers will walk 
along a specific section of the creek to measure the amount of 
erosion and erosion control factors using the Erosion Index.  I 
will obtain a map of about 10 blocks of the Minnehaha Creek 
from the Old Mill Dam in Edina to the city of Minneapolis.  On 
the basis of on my preliminary observations, I feel this is a 
representative sample of the Creek that includes many areas of 
erosion and has had erosion control efforts completed to 
prevent erosion.  In addition, this area is heavily used by 
pedestrians and is heavily populated with houses that may be 
effected by the erosion.  First, I had to develop an index to 
score erosion and to score the presence of the erosion control 
factors.  I did this with the help of the City of Minneapolis 
Park Board staff and specific references from my review of the 
literature.  Then I designed a form for the observers to score 
the amount of erosion and erosion control factors as they walk 
along the creek.  We needed two observers on both sides of the 
creek to make sure that the data collected was reliable.  A 
score will be placed on the form for each block and each side 
of the creek inspected.  Then I will add the scores up and 
compare the sum with the number in the erosion index that 
correlates to the bank and section.  In addition, I will 
compare both of the numbers in a statistical analysis.  This 
will include comparing the total of erosion control scores 
between blocks that have low erosion scores with an equal 
number of blocks that have high erosion scores. 

III.  Analysis of Data: 

Three out of the 7 erosion control factors seem to correlate 
with less erosion or have a negative correlation with erosion.  
These are straight creek flow, shallow creek levels, and the 
rocks on the banks.  

IV.  Summary and Conclusion:

I have learned that most of the control factors are not a sure 
bet and that you cannot completely stop erosion.  In addition, 
even if someone had all the factors they could not completely 
stop erosion.  The best prevention is unfortunately not manmade 
and includes a straight creek and shallow water.  If someone is 
trying to stop erosion and they do not live on a section of the 
creek that is straight, I would recommend that rocks and trees 
would work the best.  Although the total correlation of all 
factors is close to zero the p-value (probability) is .83 which 
means that there is a big variance in the amount that erosion 
control factors effect erosion. 

In general, I found out that when there were less Erosion 
Control Factors there was more erosion and when there was more 
Erosion Control Factors there was less erosion.

Application 

I can apply this information in two ways.  First, I can educate 
people on how to prevent erosion.  Second, I can be more 
careful on how I treat the creek myself.



Title:  Killing Mildew

Student Researcher: John Mulligan
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Cecelia Cope


I. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis: 

I wanted to find out if non-toxic mildew cleaners worked as 
well as toxic ones.  Millions of tons of harmful cleaners are 
poured down the drain each day.  I wanted to see if there was a 
natural alternative to all that pollution.  My hypothesis 
stated that the non-toxic solution (in this case it was Borax) 
would work as well as the toxic ones (in this case it was Tilex 
and Vanish) at cleaning mildew on the grout in-between tiles.

II. Methodology: 

I wrote my purpose statement, read about mildew, and formed my 
hypothesis.  At first, I planned to grow mildew on tiles I had 
glued on to pieces of plywood, but I couldn't grow any mildew. 
So I used tiles in my shower that already had mildew.  I 
measured the amount of mildew in each area and then washed each 
area with a different cleaner.  I recorded my results, 
conducted my analysis of data, and accepted or rejected my 
hypothesis.

III. Analysis of Data: 

The toxic ones mildew almost all came off while the non-toxic 
one had far more mildew left.

IV. Summary and conclusion: 

The non-toxic cleaner did not work nearly as well as the toxic 
ones.  Therefore, I rejected my hypothesis which stated that 
the non-toxic cleaner (in this case it was Borax) would work as 
well as the toxic ones (in this case it was Tilex and Vanish) 
at cleaning mildew on the grout in-between tiles.

V. Application: 

I found that not all products which are less harmful to the 
environment work as well as the harmful ones.



Title:  Does the Placing of Magnets Affect the Swing of a 
Pendulum?

Student Researchers:  Murphy Curran and Ben Johnson
School Address:  Christ the King/St. Thomas the Apostle School
                 3210 W. 51 st
                 Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  Eighth
Teacher:  Ms. Cope


1. Statement of purpose and hypothesis: 

We wanted to know if a minor disturbance could change the 
course of an object. This concept is known as the chaos theory.  
We chose to test it by building a pendulum and testing how 
magnetism could affect the swing of the pendulum.  Our 
hypothesis was that the magnets would add a disturbance, which 
would cause a drastic change in the original pattern of the 
pendulum swing.

2. Methodology: 

We constructed an apparatus/pendulum to test the effect of 
magnets on its swing.  Materials used were: Lightweight string 
or thread, a wooden dowel about 16 inches long and as thick as 
a pencil, two wooden sheets 12 inches high, seven donut shaped 
ceramic magnets, a sheet of wood about 16 inches long and wide 
enough to support the 12 inch sheets, cm. ruler, polar 
coordinate graph paper, and screws for apparatus.  The 
controlled variables were the starting point of the magnet 
swing, string length, pendulum size, and apparatus.  The 
experimental variables were the magnets and placement of the 
magnets.  Our control trial was to swing the pendulum without 
magnets to determine a normal pattern for a swinging pendulum.  
Then we added six magnets in three pairs of two, placed at 15 
cm., 13 cm., and 11 cm. from each pair and from the center of a 
sheet of polar coordinate graph paper.  Then we swung the 
pendulum 20 times for five trials at each distance and recorded 
and graphed the results.

3. Analysis of Data: 

The introduction of magnets changed the predictable pattern of 
the pendulum swing as shown in the control group of swings 
which used no magnets.

4. Summary and Conclusion: 

Based on our data, our hypothesis was accepted.  The 
introduction of the magnets did in fact cause a disturbance in 
the starting state of the pendulum swing, thus causing a 
drastic change in future states or swings.  We didn't encounter 
any limitations or shortcomings in our study.

5. Application:

One application of our findings would be inform people how 
various things (pollution, humans, natural causes) impact 
changes in there climate or weather conditions and how those 
variable could be controlled.



Title:  Penny on the Ground

Student:  Nick Lambert
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Mrs. Cope


I. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis: 

In this experiment, I plan to see if age, sex or race has 
anything to do with the value a person places on a coin on the 
ground.  My hypothesis was that children around the age of 11 
or younger will place more value on a penny on the ground than 
an adult.  My assumption was that because adults have more 
money than children so they'll not need spare change where 
children might. 

II. Methodology: 

First, I researched whether or not any thing like this has ever 
been done before.  Then I dropped a coin in front of Edina 50 
and watched to see if anybody would pick it up.  No one did, 
although 80 people walked by.  Then I dropped one in front of 
Pocket Change in the Southdale Mall.  Only two people picked it 
up out of 80.  Both locations were in upper middle class 
neighbor-hoods.

III. Analysis of Data:

While only two people picked up any coin, both were children, 
which goes to prove my hypothesis true to some extent. 

IV. Summary and Conclusion: 

I accepted my hypothesis because the two people that picked up 
the penny were both children.  I thought that more people would 
pick up the coin.  I wonder what it would be like if I did this 
experiment in the summer or in a different neighborhood, such 
as a poorer neighborhood or a mixed income neighborhood.  I 
also wonder what would it be like if I used a dollar bill.

V. Application: 

This experiment could use a larger and more diverse sampling 
base, as it offers indicators of cultural attitudes and values.



Title:  Passive Solar Energy

Student Researcher:  Alecia Rose
School:  Christ the King/St. Thomas the Apostle
         3210 West 51st St.
         Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410
Grade:  8
Teacher:  Cece Cope


I. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

I wanted to know if I could heat water in a solar collector 
outdoors in the winter time in Minnesota.  Solar energy can be 
either passive or active.  Solar energy can be used to heat 
your home partially or fully with either passive or active 
solar energy.  I wanted to know to what degree the sun would 
heat water in a solar collector on a full sun day, partly sunny 
day, and cloudy day.  My hypothesis stated that the water would 
be heated to the highest degree on a full sun day.

II. Methodology:

First, I wrote my statement of purpose, conducted a review of 
the literature about solar energy, and developed my hypothesis.  
I then built a passive solar collector.  I decided to try to 
heat water on a full sun day, partly sunny day, and a cloudy 
day.  I did this for four weeks.  The variables that I held 
constant were the amount of water, the number of days I 
conducted the experiment, temperature of the water, and time of 
day I tested the water.  I tested on five different days for 
each test group; full sun days, partly sunny days, and cloudy 
days.  On each test day, I poured 100 mL of 9 degree Celsius 
water into my collector.  I kept the water in the collector for 
three minutes on each collection day.  Then I recorded the 
temperature on my data collection sheet.  I repeated this 
process five times for full sun days, partly sunny days, and 
cloudy days.  Next, I conducted an analysis of my data.  
Finally, I accepted or rejected my hypothesis and wrote my 
summary and conclusion.  Then I applied my findings to the 
world outside my classroom.

III. Analysis of Data:

The full sun days heated the water to the highest temperature.  
The partly sunny days heated the water to the next highest 
temperature.  The cloudy days heated the water to the least 
highest temperature.  

IV. Summary and Conclusion:

I accepted my hypothesis.  I can heat water during the winter 
in Minnesota on a full sun day and a partly cloudy day.  The 
water did not heat on the cloudy days.  A backup heating system 
would be needed in Minnesota during the cloudy days.

V. Application:

Solar energy can be used to help heat homes.  By designing 
homes and commercial buildings to take advantage of the sun's 
position, fuel savings can be achieved.  Also, solar energy is 
safer for the environment.



Title:  Does Vision Affect Taste

Student Researcher:  Anna Veeneman
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7th 
Teacher:  Cecelia Cope


I. Statement of Purpose:

I wanted to know more about how vision affects taste.  I wanted 
to see if the color of a food affects a person's taste of that 
food.  My hypothesis stated that people's sense of taste may be 
influenced by the color of the food.

II. Methodology:

I tested my hypothesis by doing an experiment with unflavored 
mineral water and plain yogurt.  The materials I used for the 
unflavored mineral water experiment were: 6 paper cups, 6 oz. 
of mineral water, 1 drop of green food coloring, 2 drops of red 
food coloring, 1 drop of yellow food coloring, and an 
eyedropper.  For the plain yogurt experiment I used: 6 paper 
cups, 1 plastic spoon, 6 oz. of plain yogurt, 3/4 tsp. of 
sugar, 1 drop of blue food coloring, 1 drop of yellow food 
coloring, 3 drops of red food coloring, and an eyedropper.  I 
added food coloring accurately to the unflavored mineral water 
and plain yogurt.  I used the same amount of mineral water and 
plain yogurt for each subject.  Each test subject conducted 
his/her testing privately.  

For the unflavored mineral water experiment, I arranged 3 cups 
numbered 1, 2, and 3.  Each cup had 2 oz. of unflavored mineral 
water.  I added 1 drop of green food coloring to cup #1.  I 
added 1 drop of red food coloring to cup #2.  I added 1 drop of 
red and yellow food coloring to cup #3.  Then, one at a time, I 
asked each test subject to taste and identify the mineral water 
flavor in cups #1, #2, and #3. I recorded their comments. 

For the plain yogurt experiment, I arranged 3 cups numbered 1, 
2, and 3.  Each cup had 2 oz. of plain yogurt and 1/4 tsp. of 
sugar.  I mixed 1 drop of red food coloring in cup #1.  I mixed 
1 drop of yellow food coloring to cup #2.  I mixed 1 drop of 
blue and 2 drops of red food coloring to cup #3.  Then, one at 
a time, I asked each test subject to taste and identify the 
mineral water flavor in cups #1, #2, and #3. I recorded their 
comments. 

III. Analysis of Data:

I found that vision does affect taste.  I observed that people 
people's sense of taste are influenced by the color of food.  I 
observed that a test subject would look at the color of the 
food and expect to taste the flavor associated with the color 
of the unflavored water and yogurt.  People ages 10-30 were the 
most affected in that they indicated they tasted a flavor in 
the blue yogurt. People ages 30-79 were more accurate in their 
testings.  Some denied any taste in the water or yogurt 
initially, but then convinced themselves that a flavor related 
to the added color was present.

IV. Summary and Conclusion:

Many people did not like the taste of what they were tasting.  
Some people did not participate due to allergies.  Some people 
didn't like the look of the color water or yogurt and had a 
negative attitude about tasting them.  But some people did 
taste a flavor in the unflavored water and yogurt because of 
the added coloring.  Therefore, I accepted my hypothesis which 
stated that people's sense of taste may be influenced by the 
color of the food.  

V. Application:

Food producers could dye foods to help enhance their flavor and 
enjoyment by more people.



Title:  A Comparison of Recent and Recorded Temperatures 

Student Researcher:  Billy Keniston
School:  Christ The King
         Minneapolis, Minnesota
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Ms. Cope


I. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

 I noticed that some recorded temperatures in the newspaper 
were significantly higher or lower than the actual daily 
temperatures.  I wanted to measure and record temperatures for 
a period of time and compare them with official temperatures 
and the 30 year average.  My hypothesis stated that the average 
daily high and low temperatures will be significantly warmer 
than the recorded normal average for the last thirty years as 
recorded by the U. S. Weather Service.

II. Methodology: 

After I decided on my hypothesis, I created a bibliography on 
the history of temperature recording.  I read for background 
knowledge and decided on my plan.  From November 19, 1994 to 
December 15, 1994, I observed and recorded daily highs and lows 
using a maximum-minimum thermometer in my backyard.  After 
recording the temperatures on daily log forms that I created, I 
then recorded official daily high and lows along with the 
thirty-year average temperature for each day.  This information 
came from the U.S. Weather Service in the Minneapolis Star and 
Tribune newspaper.  The information was then graphed for visual 
analysis of significant changes.  Then I applied my findings to 
my hypothesis.

III. Analysis of Data: 

Two different graphs were made using the Date as one axis and 
the Temperature as the other.  Three lines were plotted: 
backyard high, official high, and thirty-year high on one 
graph.  Three lines were plotted: backyard low, official low, 
and thirty-year low on the other graph.  The graph results, 
using a significant difference figure of 4 degrees showed an 
overall warming trend.  Overall average difference between 
backyard highs and 30 year average highs was 5.5 degrees 
higher.  The average low difference was 3.5 degrees higher.

IV. Summary and Conclusion: 

There has been a warming trend in winter temperatures in recent 
years as measured in Minneapolis from November 19, 1994 to 
December 15, 1994.

V. Application: 

I can use this information and compare it with other 
environmental trends such as pollution to see if they are 
related.



Title:  The Effect of Earthworms In the Soil.

Student Researcher:  Anne Strong
School:  Christ the King & St. Thomas the Apostle School
         3210 W. 51st Street
         Minneapolis, MN 55410
Grade:  7
Teacher:  Ms. Cope


I. Statement of Purpose and Hypothesis:

I wanted to find out if herbs grow better with or without 
earthworms.  I thought that the earthworms would help the herbs 
grow and make them healthy. 

II. Methodology:

First, I got four pots and put soil in them.  Then I put 18 
redworms and 18 regular garden worms in two pots.  The other 
two pots did not have earthworms. I put one cup of dried 
leaves, which the worms like to eat, in all the pots.  I put 30 
Basil seeds in two pots and 30 Chive seeds in the other two 
pots.  Basil and Chive are good winter herbs, that's why I 
choose them.  Next, I watered all the pots with eight oz. of 
water.  Then I put all four pots by a southside window.  Every 
other day, I would measure the height, width, number of stalks, 
and number of leaves of the sprouts.  Every three days I would 
water all four pots with eight oz. of water.  I started the 
experiment in November and ended it in January.  Some of my 
variables held constant were room temperature, amount of 
sunlight, amount of waters, the type of herb, the amount of 
food(dried leaves), and the type of soil.  The only thing that 
was different was the soil with and without earthworms.

III. Analysis of Data:

I choose to put my data into a bar graph measuring the height 
of Basil with and without worms, the width of Basil with and 
without worms, the number of stalks with and without worms, and 
the number of leaves on the sprouts with and without worms.  I 
did the same for the Chive graph.  My graphs showed that, at 
the beginning of the experiment, the herbs with worms were 
doing better than the herbs without earthworms.  At the end of 
the experiment the herbs with worms started to die and the 
herbs without worms were doing better. Maybe this happened 
because I had to water the soil with worms and without worms 
differently.  The soil with worms stayed moist and was not 
watered as much as the soil without worms which was dryer.

IV. Summary and Conclusion:

I found out the herbs without worms did better than the herbs 
with worms.  At the beginning of January the herbs with worms 
started to die.   My data did not support my hypothesis.  I 
thought I had enough time to do my experiment and get all the 
materials I needed.  I really enjoyed doing this experiment and 
I would do it again and see if I get the same results.

V. Application:

I learned that you need a bigger space to grow the herbs. Some 
other researchers did the same experiment and they found out 
that earthworms helped the soil.  One man had an acre of soil 
and another man had a barrel of soil.  I think you need a 
bigger space to grow the herbs for earthworms to help.

© 1995 John I. Swang, Ph.D.